Search found 4100 matches
- Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:14 am
- Forum: Installation issues
- Topic: Failure to import PyQt4.QtGui and PyQt4.QtCore modules
- Replies: 6
- Views: 13183
Re: Failure to import PyQt4.QtGui and PyQt4.QtCore modules
Hello, If you use a precompiled version of Qt4 (you seem to be using the one from SYRTHES), and it was moved there might be some other environment variables to set (I am not sure). To test that PyQt4 (the Python + SIP + Qt4) works well, the simplest test is to run Python in a terminal (with your sam...
- Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:27 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: radiative and CS_2.1.4
- Replies: 8
- Views: 14904
Re: radiative and CS_2.1.4
Hello, Do you use user subroutines, or just the XML ? As version 2.1 is an intermediate development release and has not been tested as much as 2.0, you might have found a bug. Could you post your case setup (mesh xml, and user subroutines) for both versions 2.0 and 2.1, so we may compare ? Best rega...
- Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:22 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: How to use the gas combustion module ?
- Replies: 15
- Views: 22693
Re: How to use the gas combustion module ?
Hello,
I may not have time to check this before next week, but I'll take a look as soon as I can.
Best regards,
Yvan
I may not have time to check this before next week, but I'll take a look as soon as I can.
Best regards,
Yvan
- Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:21 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Syrthes 3.4
- Replies: 21
- Views: 26171
Re: Syrthes 3.4
Hello,
I just sent you a pre-release of version 2.2 by our large message service.
Note that the user examples for specific physics are still a work in progress, but if you are using only the standard solver, this should not make a difference.
Best regards,
Yvan
I just sent you a pre-release of version 2.2 by our large message service.
Note that the user examples for specific physics are still a work in progress, but if you are using only the standard solver, this should not make a difference.
Best regards,
Yvan
- Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:18 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: pls confirm the Units in cpincl.f90 of 2.1.4 ncs
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2684
Re: pls confirm the Units in cpincl.f90 of 2.1.4 ncs
Hello,
Yes, the marked units description is false, but everything is in SI units, so kg seems right (I am not a specialist of this part of the code, but the only possible answers are kg or kg/m3 here, so if the comment itself is correct, kg is the right answer).
Best regards,
Yvan
Yes, the marked units description is false, but everything is in SI units, so kg seems right (I am not a specialist of this part of the code, but the only possible answers are kg or kg/m3 here, so if the comment itself is correct, kg is the right answer).
Best regards,
Yvan
- Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:39 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: How to use the gas combustion module ?
- Replies: 15
- Views: 22693
Re: How to use the gas combustion module ?
Hello, No, you should not need to edit the runcase. I may have (or probably have) missed some detail, but at first glance, what you did so far seems correct. To see why it does not work, if your data is not confidential, posting your case setup (tar.gz file with both case and mesh, the smaller the b...
- Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:31 am
- Forum: Installation issues
- Topic: Build Code Saturne using ACML as BLAS source
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3813
Re: Build Code Saturne using ACML as BLAS source
Hello, I added ACML support in Code_Saturne 2.2 (which will be released in a few days; I am working on ironing out commments and documentation relative to user subroutine file renales, which is the last thing delaying the release). I was only able to test compilation/linking, not execution, as I cur...
- Tue Mar 20, 2012 4:30 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Syrthes 3.4
- Replies: 21
- Views: 26171
Re: Syrthes 3.4
Hello, Yes your use is correct. As the I-deas format allows several variant element types, it is possible that the variants supported by SALOME and Syrthes 3.4 are not the same. In any case, moving to Code_Saturne 2.2 and SYRTHES 4 would be a better option, so if we do not finally release Code_Satur...
- Tue Mar 20, 2012 4:02 pm
- Forum: Installation issues
- Topic: Some basic doubts about the installation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4535
Re: Some basic doubts about the installation
Hello, Version 2.0 can also support MED 3.0, but you have to build it with a MED 3.0.x library, not with a MED 2.3 library. Starting with 2.0.2, the automatic installer should install MED 3.0 instead of MED 2.3, but if this fails and you already have a MED 2.3.6 installed in system paths (such as wi...
- Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:18 pm
- Forum: Installation issues
- Topic: Configuration of the post-install step
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3629
Re: Configuration of the post-install step
Hello, I just tested this, and there seems to be a bug in the handling of alternative compute versions. The bug only occurs if you use an absolute path, so since you seem to have a consistent naming scheme (which is recommended), you should be able to ignore the bug using: compute_versions =noeuds i...