Hello,
Ok thanks, this will be in the next update of Syrthes (probably in a few weeks).
Best regards,
Yvan
Search found 4290 matches
- Sat Mar 21, 2026 12:14 pm
- Forum: Syrthes related questions
- Topic: process oiur faire remonter un bug dans Syrthes?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1722
- Mon Mar 16, 2026 4:01 pm
- Forum: Syrthes related questions
- Topic: process oiur faire remonter un bug dans Syrthes?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1722
Re: process oiur faire remonter un bug dans Syrthes?
Hello,
There is currently no external GitHub of Gitlab mirror for Syrthes, and the support address may not be checked as regularly as that for code_saturne (development resources on Syrthes are currently quite limited, but some members of the code_saturne dev team have write access to the internal ...
There is currently no external GitHub of Gitlab mirror for Syrthes, and the support address may not be checked as regularly as that for code_saturne (development resources on Syrthes are currently quite limited, but some members of the code_saturne dev team have write access to the internal ...
- Tue Mar 03, 2026 7:17 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Recommandation for polyhedral cells
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3577
Re: Recommandation for polyhedral cells
Hello,
For polyhedral meshes, our feedback is still limited, but your options seem reasonable.
Independently of the mesh type, small time steps usually lead to faster linear solver convergence, so for such cases, gradients and balances (whose cost is independent of the time step) can become ...
For polyhedral meshes, our feedback is still limited, but your options seem reasonable.
Independently of the mesh type, small time steps usually lead to faster linear solver convergence, so for such cases, gradients and balances (whose cost is independent of the time step) can become ...
- Tue Mar 03, 2026 6:05 pm
- Forum: Installation issues
- Topic: [SATURNE-9.1.0] Compilation with MEDCoupling 9.15.0
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3685
Re: [SATURNE-9.1.0] Compilation with MEDCoupling 9.15.0
Hello,
The lines in the "configure" are just initializations before the test.
We have had issues with MEDCoupling link on one machine running RHEL 8.8 after a system upgrade due to C++ API achanges, but recompiling both MEDCoupling and code_saturne avoids the problem. An alternative was to add the ...
The lines in the "configure" are just initializations before the test.
We have had issues with MEDCoupling link on one machine running RHEL 8.8 after a system upgrade due to C++ API achanges, but recompiling both MEDCoupling and code_saturne avoids the problem. An alternative was to add the ...
- Thu Feb 19, 2026 6:22 pm
- Forum: Syrthes related questions
- Topic: CS/Syrthes Coupling
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8014
Re: CS/Syrthes Coupling
Hello,
1) We assume that for a pseudo-steady computation, h and temperatures will all stabilize, so the flux expressed as "h(Tw-Tf)" should stabilize. Ideally, in a linear wll law region in a mesh convergence study, the flux should reach a fixed value (assuming wall law computation is also ideal ...
1) We assume that for a pseudo-steady computation, h and temperatures will all stabilize, so the flux expressed as "h(Tw-Tf)" should stabilize. Ideally, in a linear wll law region in a mesh convergence study, the flux should reach a fixed value (assuming wall law computation is also ideal ...
- Wed Feb 18, 2026 1:10 am
- Forum: Syrthes related questions
- Topic: CS/Syrthes Coupling
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8014
Re: CS/Syrthes Coupling
Hello,
Yes, for 1), you should have equilibrium at the steady state. The lower the conductivity h, the higher (Tw-Tf) will need to be to obtain a given flux, the steady solid temperature will be higher if h is lower, lower if h is higher.
For 2), for a steady solution, convergence will often be ...
Yes, for 1), you should have equilibrium at the steady state. The lower the conductivity h, the higher (Tw-Tf) will need to be to obtain a given flux, the steady solid temperature will be higher if h is lower, lower if h is higher.
For 2), for a steady solution, convergence will often be ...
- Thu Feb 12, 2026 3:36 pm
- Forum: Syrthes related questions
- Topic: CS/Syrthes Coupling
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8014
Re: CS/Syrthes Coupling
Hello,
The method used in this coupling (and the coupling with the newer code_saturne external thermal solver based on the CDO numerics) is as follows :
At each time step :
- The solid solver (Syrthes or code_saturne solid domain instance) sends a solid wall temperature.
- The fluid solver (code ...
The method used in this coupling (and the coupling with the newer code_saturne external thermal solver based on the CDO numerics) is as follows :
At each time step :
- The solid solver (Syrthes or code_saturne solid domain instance) sends a solid wall temperature.
- The fluid solver (code ...
- Sat Jan 31, 2026 1:44 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Dynamic boundary conditions
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9451
Re: Dynamic boundary conditions
Hello,
Yes, cs_user_boundary_conditions.cpp
Best regards,
Yvan
Yes, cs_user_boundary_conditions.cpp
Best regards,
Yvan
- Wed Jan 28, 2026 1:44 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Restarting cold flow simulation introducing combustion model
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7445
Re: Restarting cold flow simulation introducing combustion model
Hello,
Restarting with a change in model should work in theory, but a strong variation in computed values can lead to divergence in some cases.
First, did you check that the combustion case does not diverge if you run it for a few time steps directly (i.e. not as a restart) ? If this is OK, you ...
Restarting with a change in model should work in theory, but a strong variation in computed values can lead to divergence in some cases.
First, did you check that the combustion case does not diverge if you run it for a few time steps directly (i.e. not as a restart) ? If this is OK, you ...
- Sun Jan 11, 2026 8:05 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Modify buoyancy-term parameter Pr
- Replies: 1
- Views: 13264
Re: Modify buoyancy-term parameter Pr
Hello,
If you want to replace "cs_real_t prdtur = 1;", since it is a local definition, a user-defined file will not be enough.
You can try using the modified source code file as a user-defined file, but I am not sure whether this will work or lead to link-time issues. It did work in most cases ...
If you want to replace "cs_real_t prdtur = 1;", since it is a local definition, a user-defined file will not be enough.
You can try using the modified source code file as a user-defined file, but I am not sure whether this will work or lead to link-time issues. It did work in most cases ...